2008 Team-by-team Preview: Baltimore Orioles
What can you say about the Baltimore Orioles?
Consider the fact that the last time the team had a winning season- ten years ago- there were no such things ipods or mp3s, Bill Clinton was still in the White House, LeAnn Rimes won the Grammy Award for best new artist (and sold at least 17 million records since then), and Kate Winslet and Leonardo DiCaprio created an epic love story on board the “Titanic”, spawning a number of box office records while doing so, not to mention an incredibly annoying Celine Dion song as well.
Yes, it’s been a long while since they’ve seen a winning ballclub in Baltimore.
That 1997 club had a still-productive Cal Ripken Jr., a fiery Roberto Alomar leading the clubhouse (and spitting in umpire’s faces), and a pitching staff with three 15-game winners. Since then, the once proud franchise of Earl Weaver, Frank and Brooks Robinson, and Jim Palmer, has suffered multiple ignominies: Rafael Palmeiro’s positive steroid result and subsequent acrimonious finger-pointing; Sammy Sosa dragging his broken body to a .221 average; Albert Belle; Sidney Ponson; Mike Hargrove.
It’s been a tough decade. Orioles fans in Baltimore deserve better. And so Andy MacPhail- who had successfully turned the Minnesota Twins and Chicago Cubs into competitive winners on his watch- was brought on board to provide Baltimore fans with a winning, competitive team, following in the footsteps of his father, Hall of Fame executive Lee MacPhail, who ran the Orioles during the 1950s.
Imagine my reaction, then, when I read reports that the Orioles were considering trading left-handed ace Erik Bedard to the Los Angeles Dodgers for a package that included Dodger prospect Matt Kemp: “Here we go again.” Sure, with his promising 2007 season (.342 average, 10 home runs, and 10 stolen bases in 98 games) Kemp has the potential to be an immediate impact player on a major league roster. But considering the current value given upon pitching these days- especially dominating left-handed starters such as Erik Bedard- would a package centered around Kemp be equal in value, even if it included other Dodger prospects Jonathan Broxton and Clayton Kershaw?
Considering that Bedard is signed through 2009, I’d argue that giving up on Bedard early would be far too foolish. Bedard could potentially be the most dominating pitcher in the league, if not all of baseball. It appears that MacPhail is attempting the prudent route of signing Bedard to an extension, which bodes the greatest chance for both the Orioles’ immediate and long-term success. As MacPahil says, “Young left-handed pitchers don’t grow on trees. Especially potentially dominating ones.” Besides, if it’s obvious that the Orioles have no choice except to trade Bedard, they better trade such a valuable commodity for some proven talent rather than a collection of potential talent (or potential duds) as the Dodgers are offering. Besides, considering that the Orioles are drafting fourth in next year’s MLB draft, there’s every good a chance that a major-league ready 23-year old toolsy outfielder is wating to be plucked from college and instantly placed in the Orioles’ outfield. With chances like that, it makes little sense to sacrifice such a dominating starting pitcher like Bedard.
Besides, a closer look at the horror show that is the rest of the Orioles’ rotation shows just how necessary Bedard is. If Daniel Cabrera becomes the team’s de facto ace, you can write this team all but out of contention. After a surprising rookie season (7-5, 3.70 ERA) Jeremy Guthrie should be able to closely match those results. Other than that, the young starting pitching talent- 24-year old Adam Loewen, 23-year old Hayden Penn- are still a year or so away from having an impact on the team’s starting rotation. The Orioles are also high on 25-year old Radhammes Liz, who can play an effective role in the starting rotation or as a set-up man (even possible closer) in a depleted bullpen. With the two favorite choices for closer- Chris Ray and Danys Baez- being sidelined by Tommy John surgery for the majority of 2008, the closer’s job is vacant in the Orioles’ bullpen. Unless the team lands Francisco Cordero- the top available free-agent closer now that Mariano Rivera is off the market- I could imagine a spirited competition in spring training for the closer’s job coming down to Jaime Walker, Chad Bradford and Liz. Walker is my favorite to start the 2008 season as closer, but anything’s possible.
The offense has a key nucleus that the team can build around during the off-season, either through free agent signings or with trades. Brian Roberts has established himself as the heart and soul of the Orioles’ offense, and he could be poised for his best season yet: 200 hits, .300 average, 50 stolen bases. If the Orioles end up somehow qualifying, then it’s not that much of a stretch that Roberts could be considered an MVP candidate. Though its been a few years since Kevin Millar has seen his power stroke, he’s my pick for an Oriole batter to have a surprise year in 2008, while Miguel Tejada- if he’s not traded- and future superstar Nick Markakis will both top .300. Of their offense, the Orioles also have many extra parts that they could shop around for possible pitching help either this off-season or even into the season, including Melvin Mora, Jay Payton, Aubrey Huff, and Jay Gibbons.
But ultimately, what the Orioles’ chances of competing comes down to is whether they’re able to keep Erik Bedard through 2008 or not. As long as they keep him, then I’m going to go out on a limb here and say I like the Orioles chances of shaking off the past decade of futility and actually finish above .500. Even if it’s by only a few games. 2008 will be the O’s taking the first cautious steps towards respectability under manager Dave Trembley.
6 Comments »
Leave a comment
-
Archives
- October 2008 (4)
- July 2008 (6)
- June 2008 (18)
- May 2008 (20)
- April 2008 (38)
- March 2008 (20)
- February 2008 (10)
- January 2008 (15)
- December 2007 (24)
- November 2007 (16)
- October 2007 (46)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
I cannot resist commenting here. While I understand the importance of holding on to a strikeout pitcher like Bedard — especially when you are left with a staff that will be serving up neck-breakers to the AL East next year — the Orioles would be foolish not to pull the trigger on a trade that included Kemp, Kershaw and Broxton. I don’t think the Marlins or the Twins would pass up that offer for their respective future hall of famers.
As a Dodger fan I would be hard pressed to include two of those three, even for Johan Santana (due to contract reasons). Kershaw is perhaps the best left hand prospect in the minors right now and could be a star come the start of the 2009 season. I’m not entirely sold on Kemp — we have yet to see whether he has the mettle to be a great player as talent only get you so far in the bigs — but he is one of those 5-tool beasts that don’t come around everyday. There is good reason that he is know as the “Bison” among Dodger bloggers. As for Broxton, I think he is the most expendable of the three as you have a great prospect like Jonathan Meloan not too far behind him.
Bottom line: I don’t think I would forgive the Dodgers for a long time if they pulled the trigger on a deal like that and if I were an Orioles fan and found out that my team did not make that move, I might just start watching the Nationals.
Not sure about this ,e specially since its coming from a Dodger fan’s perspective. You leave the Orioles playing for the future while suffering 110-loss seasons with Daniel Cabrera as the team’s purported “ace.” Sure, in the long run it might pay off, but tarnished dreams are built on the back of failed prospects. Remember Kevin Maas? Sam Horn? Ron Kittle? Hensely Muelens? Brien Taylor? Eric Anthony? Prospects all, and didn’t amount to diddley-squat.
If the Orioles had enough pitching to support the loss of Bedard, then the proposed move wouldn’t be that big of a deal. But they don’t, as their planned pitchers of the future are exactly that- of the future. Loewen and Penn were supposed to have arrived by now, but haven’t, which makes me wonder if it’s not another example of putting eggs in baskets before counting them, or some other mixed metaphor. I’m skeptical that the crop of young Orioles pitchers will have an impact in 2007, so if you subtract bedard without replacing him with equal talent- we are talking a dominating left-hander, perhaps the most scarcest commodity in all of baseball- then the team will be a dismal one indeed in 2007, with chances looking clearly for the next two to three years beyond that. Sure, everything could break just so and the Orioles young pitching and any possible prospects received in exchange for Bedard mature at a fast pace and form a strong nucleus of a team. But this is the AL East, and these players need to approach Roy Halladay or Hanley Ramirez levels for the Orioles to be something more than a third-place club.
The Orioles would be better off attempting to emulate the Red Sox and the Yankees as they attempt to compete with them in their division. And that means taking a page from their book and committing as much money as needed to keep their proven home-grown developments, not just Bedard but Nick Markakis as well. Otherwise, if you develop players to trade them for the enxt batch of players to develop to trade, then what’s the point? That’s a recipe for an also-ran, never a competitior…
I can’t see any benefit for the Orioles in trading Bedard, at least not this off season. He’s an ace that every other team in baseball covets and the anchor of the O’s staff right now.
Having a pitcher who could easily win 20 games is a commodity not easily replaced. By not trading him now Baltimore can either build a competitive team around him, thus increasing the chance of resigning him, or worst case scenario, they’ll still have the opportunity to trade him after the All Star break or in the next post season and get better return for him, especially if he goes to the All-Star team and/or is voted Cy Young winner.
Agreed. The Orioles’ chances to even be a .500 team begins and ends with Erik Bedard. There should be no limit to locking him up to a long-term contract, even if that means setting the market standard. That’s how much he means to the team’s fortunes, and he would be an ace on any roster. Of course, there’s always the chance that you run the risk of repeating a mistake along the liens of Darren Driefort’s huge contract…
[...] I’ve all ready stated the high esteem I hold EriKKK Bedard, who could eventually supplant Johan Santana as the best [...]
Pingback by The Mariners the Statistical Equivalent of the Yankees? « Rally Fried | January 18, 2008 |
I really liked your blog with the Roy Halladay item. I think Halladay will be an instant hall-of-famer.
I try to follow as much MLB news as I can from Caracas, Venzuela.